Z8F0413SB005SC Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The Z8F0413SB005SC is an eZ8 Encore!® XP® 8-bit microcontroller manufactured by Zilog, featuring 4KB FLASH program memory, 1KB RAM, and integrated peripherals including UART/USART, PWM, and watchdog timer functionality. This device is classified as obsolete, making identification of compatible substitute parts essential for ongoing system support, maintenance, and new design implementations where legacy compatibility is required.

Substiute Parts

Z8F0413SB005SC

ZilogIn Stock: 1093Z8F0413SB005SC Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

Z8F0413SB005SG

ZilogIn Stock: 1070Z8F0413SB005SG Datasheet

DirectRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution of the Z8F0413SB005SC is determined by strict equivalence across the following critical parameters:

• Core processor architecture (eZ8)
• Memory configuration (4KB FLASH, 1KB RAM)
• Operating frequency (5MHz)
• Supply voltage range (2.7V ~ 3.6V)
• I/O pin count (6)
• Package type and dimensions (8-SOIC)
• Peripheral feature set (UART/USART, PWM, WDT, Brown-out Detect/Reset, LED, POR)
• Operating temperature range (0°C ~ 70°C)

The Z8F0413SB005SG meets all these criteria and is classified as a direct substitute. The primary distinction between these parts is packaging format and product status, not functional or electrical characteristics.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The Z8F0413SB005SG is a direct functional equivalent to the Z8F0413SB005SC. Selection between these parts should be based on the following factors:

Product Status: The Z8F0413SB005SG carries Active product status, ensuring continued manufacturer support and availability. The Z8F0413SB005SC is classified as Obsolete, limiting future procurement options.

Regulatory Compliance: The Z8F0413SB005SG is ROHS3 compliant, meeting current environmental and regulatory requirements. The Z8F0413SB005SC is RoHS non-compliant, which may restrict use in applications subject to RoHS directives.

Packaging: The Z8F0413SB005SG is supplied in Tube packaging, while the Z8F0413SB005SC uses standard packaging. Both formats are compatible with standard assembly processes.

For new designs or systems requiring long-term support, the Z8F0413SB005SG is the preferred selection. For legacy system maintenance where the original part number must be retained, the Z8F0413SB005SC remains functionally equivalent where available.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Are Z8F0413SB005SC and Z8F0413SB005SG pin-compatible?

A: Yes. Both devices use the 8-SOIC package with identical pin assignments, memory configuration, and peripheral functionality. Direct PCB substitution is possible without design modification.

Q: What is the difference between these two part numbers?

A: The primary differences are product status (Obsolete vs. Active), RoHS compliance (non-compliant vs. ROHS3 compliant), and packaging format (standard vs. Tube). All electrical and functional parameters are identical.

Q: Can I use Z8F0413SB005SG in place of Z8F0413SB005SC?

A: Yes. The Z8F0413SB005SG is a direct substitute with identical core functionality, memory, speed, and peripheral features. It is suitable for replacement in existing applications and new designs.

Q: Why is the Z8F0413SB005SC marked as Obsolete?

A: Obsolete status indicates that Zilog has discontinued active production and support for this specific part number. The Z8F0413SB005SG remains in active production as the current equivalent.

Q: Are there any firmware or software compatibility issues between these parts?

A: No. Both devices use the same eZ8 core processor architecture and instruction set. Firmware compiled for the Z8F0413SB005SC executes identically on the Z8F0413SB005SG without modification.

Q: What is the significance of the packaging difference (standard vs. Tube)?

A: Tube packaging is a standard format for automated assembly processes and provides equivalent protection and handling characteristics. The choice between packaging formats is typically driven by procurement and assembly workflow requirements rather than technical performance.