XPCROY-L1-0000-00802 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The XPCROY-L1-0000-00802 is an XLamp® XP-C Blue LED operating at 455nm wavelength in a 1414 (3535 Metric) surface mount package. This part is classified as obsolete, necessitating identification of active equivalent components for new designs and production continuity. The XP-C series has been superseded by newer XLamp® generations, making substitute part evaluation critical for procurement and design engineering.

Substiute Parts

XPCROY-L1-0000-00802

CreeLED, Inc.In Stock: 855XPCROY-L1-0000-00802 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

XBDROY-00-0000-000000J02

CreeLED, Inc.In Stock: 931XBDROY-00-0000-000000J02 Datasheet

SimilarRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

The XBDROY-00-0000-000000J02 qualifies as a functional substitute based on the following alignment of critical parameters:

Wavelength Compatibility: Both parts operate at 455nm (450nm ~ 460nm) blue wavelength, meeting identical optical requirements.

Electrical Compatibility: Test current of 350mA is identical. Forward voltage differs slightly (3.1V vs. 3.3V), remaining within acceptable circuit design tolerances for LED applications.

Luminous Flux Performance: The substitute delivers 463mW (450mW ~ 475mW) compared to 325mW (300mW ~ 350mW), representing improved light output at equivalent test conditions.

Mounting and Assembly: Both parts are surface mount devices with identical mounting type classification.

Regulatory Compliance: Both parts share REACH Unaffected and EAR99 ECCN classifications.

Key Substitution Constraints: Package geometry differs (1010 vs. 1414), requiring PCB layout modification. Maximum current rating increases from 500mA to 1A. Thermal resistance improves from 12°C/W to 6.5°C/W. Viewing angle increases from 125° to 135°.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The XBDROY-00-0000-000000J02 is the designated substitute for the obsolete XPCROY-L1-0000-00802. Selection is supported by active product status, identical wavelength specification, matching test current, and equivalent regulatory compliance (REACH Unaffected, EAR99).

The substitute exhibits superior thermal performance (6.5°C/W vs. 12°C/W) and higher luminous flux output (463mW vs. 325mW), providing design margin improvements. Forward voltage reduction (3.1V vs. 3.3V) is within standard circuit tolerance ranges.

PCB layout redesign is required due to package size reduction from 1414 to 1010 (3535 Metric to 2525 Metric). Thermal management design may be simplified due to improved thermal resistance characteristics.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the XBDROY-00-0000-000000J02 directly replace the XPCROY-L1-0000-00802 without circuit modification?

A: Electrical substitution is feasible at the component level due to matching test current (350mA) and compatible forward voltage (3.1V vs. 3.3V). However, PCB layout modification is mandatory due to package geometry change from 1414 to 1010 (3535 Metric to 2525 Metric).

Q: What are the implications of the package size reduction?

A: The substitute occupies a smaller footprint (2.45mm x 2.45mm vs. 3.45mm x 3.45mm) and lower profile (1.97mm vs. 2.13mm). PCB trace routing, solder pad geometry, and thermal via placement require redesign. Assembly equipment compatibility must be verified for the 1010 package format.

Q: Does the higher luminous flux of the substitute affect circuit design?

A: Luminous flux increase (463mW vs. 325mW) at identical test current (350mA) indicates improved efficiency. Existing current-limiting circuits remain valid. Optical system design may require adjustment if the original design relied on specific light output characteristics.

Q: Are there compliance differences between the two parts?

A: Both parts share identical regulatory classifications: REACH Unaffected and EAR99 ECCN. No compliance barriers exist for substitution.

Q: What is the significance of the improved thermal resistance in the substitute?

A: Thermal resistance reduction from 12°C/W to 6.5°C/W indicates superior heat dissipation capability. Thermal management design can be simplified, and junction temperature will be lower under equivalent operating conditions.

Q: Is the increased maximum current rating (1A vs. 500mA) relevant for substitution?

A: The increased maximum current rating provides design margin but does not affect substitution feasibility when operating at the specified test current of 350mA. Circuit design remains unchanged.