XMLCTW-A0-0000-00C3ABC02 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The XMLCTW-A0-0000-00C3ABC02 is a CreeLED XLamp® XM-L RGBW (Red, Green, Blue, White - Cool) LED in 2020 (5050 Metric) surface mount package. This part is classified as Obsolete, making identification of compatible substitute components essential for ongoing design support and production continuity. The part delivers 625nm Red, 528nm Green, 458nm Blue, and 6850K White wavelengths with a maximum current rating of 1A across all color channels and a viewing angle of 130°.

Substiute Parts

XMLCTW-A0-0000-00C3ABC02

CreeLED, Inc.In Stock: 864XMLCTW-A0-0000-00C3ABC02 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

XMLDCL-00-0000-00C5ABC02

CreeLED, Inc.In Stock: 1148XMLDCL-00-0000-00C5ABC02 Datasheet

SimilarRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution of the XMLCTW-A0-0000-00C3ABC02 is determined by the following critical parameters:

• Color Configuration: RGBW (Red, Green, Blue, White - Cool) wavelengths must match exactly
• Wavelength Specifications: 625nm Red, 528nm Green, 458nm Blue, 6850K White
• Package Type: 2020 (5050 Metric) surface mount package
• Mounting Compatibility: Surface mount technology
• Physical Dimensions: 5.00mm x 5.00mm footprint with 3.15mm maximum seated height
• Electrical Compatibility: Forward voltage and current ratings must support the application circuit design

The XMLDCL-00-0000-00C5ABC02 qualifies as a substitute based on matching color configuration, wavelength specifications, package dimensions, and surface mount compatibility. This part represents an upgraded generation (XM-L® Gen 2) with improved performance characteristics while maintaining the same physical footprint and color output specifications.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The XMLDCL-00-0000-00C5ABC02 is the appropriate substitute for the obsolete XMLCTW-A0-0000-00C3ABC02 based on the following factors:

Product Status: The XMLCTW is classified as Obsolete, while the XMLDCL is Active. Active product status ensures continued availability, manufacturing support, and compliance with current regulatory requirements.

Compliance & Certifications: Both parts maintain EAR99 export classification and HTSUS code 8541.41.0000 consistency. The XMLDCL maintains compatibility with the same regulatory framework.

Physical & Electrical Compatibility: Both parts share identical 2020 (5050 Metric) package dimensions, 5.00mm x 5.00mm footprint, and 3.15mm maximum seated height. Surface mount compatibility is maintained. The XMLDCL operates at lower forward voltages across all color channels (Red: 2.1V vs 2.25V, Green: 2.6V vs 3.3V, Blue: 2.9V vs 3.1V, White: 2.9V vs 3.1V), which may reduce power consumption in existing circuit designs. The XMLDCL supports higher maximum current ratings (1.75A vs 1A), providing design flexibility for increased brightness applications.

Thermal Performance: The XMLDCL demonstrates superior thermal characteristics with 0.8°C/W thermal resistance compared to 4.6°C/W in the original part, enabling better heat dissipation in high-current applications.

Viewing Angle Consideration: The XMLDCL has a 120° viewing angle versus 130° for the original part. This represents a 10° reduction in viewing angle and should be evaluated against specific application requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the XMLDCL-00-0000-00C5ABC02 be used as a direct replacement for the XMLCTW-A0-0000-00C3ABC02?

A: Yes, the XMLDCL qualifies as a substitute based on matching RGBW color configuration, identical wavelength specifications (625nm Red, 528nm Green, 458nm Blue, 6850K White), and identical 2020 (5050 Metric) package dimensions. Both parts are surface mount components with 5.00mm x 5.00mm footprints and 3.15mm maximum seated heights. Circuit design must account for lower forward voltages and higher maximum current ratings in the XMLDCL.

Q: What are the key electrical differences between these parts?

A: The XMLDCL operates at lower forward voltages across all color channels (approximately 0.15V to 0.7V reduction per channel) and supports higher maximum current ratings (1.75A versus 1A). These differences may reduce power consumption and enable higher brightness operation. Forward voltage reduction may require circuit recalibration for current-limiting resistor values.

Q: Does the viewing angle difference affect compatibility?

A: The XMLDCL has a 120° viewing angle compared to 130° for the XMLCTW. This 10° reduction should be evaluated against specific application requirements. Applications requiring wide-angle light distribution may need design review.

Q: Are both parts RoHS compliant?

A: The XMLCTW-A0-0000-00C3ABC02 is explicitly marked as RoHS Compliant. RoHS compliance status for the XMLDCL-00-0000-00C5ABC02 is not provided in the available specifications.

Q: What is the packaging difference between these parts?

A: The XMLCTW is supplied in standard packaging, while the XMLDCL is supplied in Tape & Reel (TR) format. Both maintain identical component dimensions and surface mount compatibility. Tape & Reel packaging is standard for high-volume production environments.

Q: Why is thermal resistance important for this substitution?

A: The XMLDCL has significantly lower thermal resistance (0.8°C/W versus 4.6°C/W), indicating superior heat dissipation capability. This improvement allows the part to operate at higher currents with better thermal management, reducing junction temperature rise in the application circuit.