MX6SWT-H1-0000-000CA2 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The MX6SWT-H1-0000-000CA2 is an XLamp® MX-6S white neutral LED (4750K) designed for surface mount applications. This component is classified as obsolete, making identification of suitable substitute parts essential for ongoing production and maintenance requirements. The part delivers 104 lumens at 25°C under 60mA test current with a forward voltage of 20V and 87 lm/W efficiency. Given its discontinued status, the MX6AWT-H1-0000-000CA2 serves as the primary equivalent option for new designs and component replacement.

Substiute Parts

MX6SWT-H1-0000-000CA2

CreeLED, Inc.In Stock: 1016MX6SWT-H1-0000-000CA2 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

MX6AWT-H1-0000-000CA2

CreeLED, Inc.In Stock: 742MX6AWT-H1-0000-000CA2 Datasheet

SimilarRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

The MX6AWT-H1-0000-000CA2 qualifies as a substitute based on the following matching parameters:

• Color & CCT: Both parts are white neutral LEDs at 4750K
• Luminous Flux: Identical flux range of 100lm ~ 107lm at 25°C
• CRI: Both maintain CRI of 80
• Viewing Angle: Both provide 120° viewing angle
• Mounting & Package: Both are 2-SMD surface mount components with identical 5.00mm x 5.00mm footprint and 1.48mm maximum seated height
• Thermal Resistance: Both have 5°C/W thermal resistance
• MSL Rating: Both are MSL 2A (4 Weeks)

The primary difference lies in electrical operating parameters: the MX6AWT operates at 3.3V typical forward voltage with 300mA test current, compared to the MX6SWT's 20V and 60mA. This represents a different internal architecture within the same XLamp family, with the MX6AWT offering higher efficiency at 105 lm/W versus 87 lm/W.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The MX6AWT-H1-0000-000CA2 is the appropriate substitute for the obsolete MX6SWT-H1-0000-000CA2 based on product status and compliance considerations. The MX6AWT is actively manufactured and carries RoHS compliance certification, ensuring regulatory alignment for new production. Both parts maintain identical photometric characteristics (flux, CCT, CRI, viewing angle) and mechanical compatibility (footprint, height, thermal resistance).

Circuit design modifications are required due to the different electrical operating parameters. The MX6AWT's lower forward voltage (3.3V vs. 20V) and higher test current (300mA vs. 60mA) necessitate redesign of current-limiting and voltage regulation circuitry. The MX6AWT's higher efficiency (105 lm/W vs. 87 lm/W) provides improved power performance in the new configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the MX6AWT-H1-0000-000CA2 be used as a direct drop-in replacement for the MX6SWT-H1-0000-000CA2?

A: No. While both parts share identical photometric properties and mechanical footprints, the MX6AWT requires circuit redesign due to different electrical specifications (3.3V vs. 20V forward voltage, 300mA vs. 60mA test current). PCB layout remains compatible, but power supply and current-limiting circuitry must be modified.

Q: Are the package dimensions identical between these parts?

A: Yes. Both parts are 5.00mm x 5.00mm with 1.48mm maximum seated height. The MX6AWT includes an exposed pad variant of the 2-SMD Gull Wing package, which may provide improved thermal performance in applications requiring enhanced heat dissipation.

Q: What is the significance of the product status difference?

A: The MX6SWT is obsolete and no longer manufactured. The MX6AWT is actively produced, ensuring long-term availability and supply chain stability for new designs and ongoing production requirements.

Q: Do both parts meet the same compliance standards?

A: Both parts are REACH Unaffected and classified as EAR99. The MX6AWT additionally carries RoHS Compliant certification. Both maintain MSL 2A (4 Weeks) moisture sensitivity ratings.

Q: How do the efficiency ratings compare?

A: The MX6AWT delivers 105 lm/W compared to the MX6SWT's 87 lm/W at their respective test currents. This represents improved energy efficiency in the newer design, though direct comparison requires accounting for the different operating voltages and currents.