MEM2012P75R0 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The MEM2012P75R0 is a 3rd order LC (Pi) EMI filter designed for low-pass filtering applications in data line circuits for mobile devices. This component features a 75 MHz cutoff frequency, 200 mA current rating, and 0805 (2012 Metric) surface mount packaging with 3-pad configuration. The part is currently listed as obsolete, making identification of suitable substitutes essential for ongoing design support and production continuity.

Substiute Parts

MEM2012P75R0

TDK CorporationIn Stock: 1118MEM2012P75R0 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

MEM2012F75R0T001

TDK CorporationIn Stock: 1057MEM2012F75R0T001 Datasheet

MFR RecommendedRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution for the MEM2012P75R0 is determined by strict equivalence across the following critical parameters:

• Filter Type: Low Pass
• Filter Order: 3rd
• Technology: LC (Pi)
• Center / Cutoff Frequency: 75 MHz
• Attenuation Value: 20 dB @ 700 MHz ~ 2 GHz
• Number of Channels: 1
• Current Rating: 200 mA
• Voltage - Rated: 12 V
• Operating Temperature Range: -40°C ~ 85°C
• Package / Case: 0805 (2012 Metric), 3 PC Pad
• Mounting Type: Surface Mount
• Physical Dimensions: 0.079" L x 0.049" W (2.00 mm x 1.25 mm)

The MEM2012F75R0T001 meets all these criteria and is classified as the manufacturer-recommended substitute. The primary difference is packaging format (Tape & Reel versus Cut Tape) and product status (Active versus Obsolete).

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The MEM2012F75R0T001 is the direct functional equivalent of the MEM2012P75R0 and is designated as the manufacturer-recommended substitute. Selection of this part is supported by the following factors:

• All electrical parameters are identical: filter characteristics, frequency response, current rating, and voltage specification match exactly.
• All mechanical parameters are identical: package type, mounting configuration, and footprint dimensions are equivalent.
• The substitute part carries Active product status, ensuring ongoing availability and manufacturing support.
• The substitute part is ROHS3 compliant, meeting current environmental and regulatory requirements.
• Height variation (0.039" versus 0.030") is within typical PCB assembly tolerances for surface mount components and does not affect electrical performance or standard assembly processes.
• Both parts maintain identical Moisture Sensitivity Level (MSL 1) and thermal operating range.

The primary distinction is packaging format: the substitute is supplied in Tape & Reel format rather than Cut Tape. This difference affects procurement and assembly logistics but does not impact component functionality or circuit performance.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can MEM2012F75R0T001 be used as a direct replacement for MEM2012P75R0 in existing designs?

A: Yes. The MEM2012F75R0T001 is electrically and mechanically equivalent. All filter specifications, frequency response, current handling, voltage rating, and operating temperature range are identical. The component will function identically in the circuit.

Q: What is the difference between Cut Tape (CT) and Tape & Reel (TR) packaging?

A: Cut Tape packaging supplies components in individual strips, typically used for small-quantity orders or manual assembly. Tape & Reel packaging supplies components on continuous reels, optimized for high-volume automated assembly. Both formats contain the same component; the difference is in delivery and handling method.

Q: Does the height difference (0.030" versus 0.039") affect PCB assembly or circuit performance?

A: No. The height variation of 0.009" (0.24 mm) is within standard PCB assembly tolerances for surface mount components. This difference does not affect electrical performance, signal integrity, or standard reflow soldering processes.

Q: Is MEM2012F75R0T001 ROHS compliant?

A: Yes. The MEM2012F75R0T001 is ROHS3 compliant, meeting current environmental and regulatory requirements for electronic components.

Q: Why is MEM2012P75R0 listed as obsolete?

A: Product obsolescence is determined by the manufacturer based on production decisions and market demand. The MEM2012F75R0T001 is the active equivalent and is recommended for all new designs and ongoing production requirements.

Q: Are there any other substitutes available for this filter specification?

A: Based on the provided data, MEM2012F75R0T001 is the manufacturer-designated substitute. Any alternative would require verification of identical electrical and mechanical parameters across all specified criteria.