EPF6010ATC100-3 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The EPF6010ATC100-3 is a FLEX 6000 Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) IC with 71 I/O pins in a 100-TQFP package. This device is classified as obsolete, making substitute components necessary for new designs and production continuity. The FLEX 6000 series represents legacy FPGA technology; equivalent alternatives must match critical electrical and mechanical specifications to ensure functional compatibility in existing applications.

Substiute Parts

EPF6010ATC100-3

IntelIn Stock: 2814EPF6010ATC100-3 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

XC2S15-5VQG100C

AMDIn Stock: 15832XC2S15-5VQG100C Datasheet

MFR RecommendedRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitute components for the EPF6010ATC100-3 must satisfy the following criteria based on allowed electrical and mechanical parameters:

Primary Substitution Criteria:

• Package type: 100-pin TQFP or equivalent 100-pin QFP variant (100-VQFP acceptable)
• Mounting type: Surface Mount
• Operating temperature range: 0°C ~ 85°C (TJ) minimum
• I/O pin count: Minimum 60 pins (functional compatibility with reduced I/O density acceptable)
• Logic capacity: Minimum 432 logic elements (reduced from 880)
• Gate count: Minimum 15000 gates

The XC2S15-5VQG100C (AMD Spartan-II series) qualifies as a substitute based on matching package footprint (100-pin), surface mount technology, compatible operating temperature range, and sufficient logic capacity for applications requiring FLEX 6000 functionality.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

Product Status Consideration: The EPF6010ATC100-3 is classified as obsolete, while the XC2S15-5VQG100C is designated Last Time Buy. This status difference indicates that the substitute part remains available for a limited period but will eventually reach end-of-life.

Compliance Differences: The main part is RoHS non-compliant, whereas the substitute (XC2S15-5VQG100C) is ROHS3 compliant. Applications subject to RoHS regulations must account for this compliance difference.

Electrical Compatibility: The supply voltage ranges differ between the two devices (3V ~ 3.6V versus 2.375V ~ 2.625V). Circuit designs must accommodate the substitute part's lower voltage specification through appropriate power supply adjustment or voltage regulation.

Packaging and Handling: The substitute part features improved moisture sensitivity (MSL 3 versus MSL 6), requiring less stringent storage and handling protocols during manufacturing.

Logic Capacity Trade-offs: The substitute provides reduced I/O count (60 versus 71) and logic element density (432 versus 880). Applications must verify that designs can function within these reduced capacity parameters.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the XC2S15-5VQG100C directly replace the EPF6010ATC100-3 without PCB modifications?

A: The 100-pin package footprint is mechanically compatible (both 14x14mm), allowing socket-level replacement. However, the reduced I/O pin count (60 versus 71) and different voltage supply requirements necessitate circuit design verification before implementation.

Q: What are the key differences in I/O availability between these parts?

A: The EPF6010ATC100-3 provides 71 I/O pins, while the XC2S15-5VQG100C provides 60 I/O pins. Designs utilizing more than 60 I/O signals cannot be directly ported to the substitute without redesign.

Q: Are there voltage supply compatibility issues?

A: Yes. The main part operates at 3V ~ 3.6V, while the substitute operates at 2.375V ~ 2.625V. Power supply circuits must be adjusted accordingly. Direct voltage substitution without circuit modification will result in device malfunction or damage.

Q: How do the logic capacities compare?

A: The EPF6010ATC100-3 contains 880 logic elements and 10000 gates. The XC2S15-5VQG100C contains 432 logic elements and 15000 gates. Designs must be verified to operate within the reduced logic element count of the substitute.

Q: What is the significance of the product status difference?

A: The main part is obsolete and no longer manufactured. The substitute is in Last Time Buy status, meaning it remains available for a limited period. Long-term production planning should account for the eventual discontinuation of both devices.

Q: Does the improved RoHS compliance of the substitute affect compatibility?

A: RoHS compliance is a regulatory and environmental consideration, not a functional compatibility factor. The substitute's ROHS3 compliance is advantageous for applications subject to RoHS regulations but does not affect electrical or mechanical interchangeability.

Q: What is the practical impact of the MSL rating difference?

A: The substitute's MSL 3 rating (168 hours) is more favorable than the main part's MSL 6 (Time on Label). This means the substitute requires less stringent moisture control during storage and handling, reducing manufacturing process complexity.