EPC2016C GaNFET N-Channel 100V 18A Die Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The EPC2016C is an N-Channel Gallium Nitride Field Effect Transistor (GaNFET) rated for 100V drain-to-source voltage with 18A continuous drain current at 25°C. This component is supplied as a surface mount die in Cut Tape and Digi-Reel packaging formats. The EPC2016C carries a "Not For New Designs" product status, indicating that EPC has transitioned this part to end-of-life or legacy classification. Engineers designing new systems or requiring long-term supply assurance must identify functionally compatible substitute components from the active product portfolio.

Substiute Parts

EPC2016C

EPCIn Stock: 1684EPC2016C Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

EPC2052

EPCIn Stock: 3617EPC2052 Datasheet

MFR RecommendedRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution of the EPC2016C is determined by electrical and mechanical compatibility within the GaNFET N-Channel 100V die category. The critical parameters governing substitution are:

Voltage Rating: Both the main part and substitute must maintain Vdss of 100V to ensure equivalent voltage stress capability.

Current Rating: The substitute part must support the application's required continuous drain current. The EPC2016C delivers 18A; substitutes with lower current ratings (such as 8.2A) are suitable only for applications with reduced current demands.

On-Resistance (Rds On): The EPC2016C exhibits 16 mOhm maximum on-resistance at 11A and 5V gate drive. Substitutes with comparable or lower on-resistance maintain thermal and efficiency performance.

Gate Charge (Qg) and Input Capacitance (Ciss): These parameters affect switching speed and gate drive requirements. The EPC2016C specifies 4.5 nC gate charge and 420 pF input capacitance. Substitutes with identical or lower values ensure compatible gate drive circuits.

Gate Threshold Voltage (Vgs(th)): Fixed at 2.5V maximum for the EPC2016C. Substitutes must match this specification to ensure consistent switching behavior with existing gate drive designs.

Package and Mounting: Both parts must be surface mount dies to maintain mechanical and thermal interface compatibility.

Compliance and Status: Substitutes must carry active product status and current compliance certifications (RoHS3, REACH Unaffected) to support new designs and long-term availability.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

For New Designs: The EPC2052 is the appropriate selection. It carries Active product status, ensuring long-term availability and supply chain continuity. Both parts comply with RoHS3 and REACH requirements, supporting current regulatory standards.

Current Capacity Consideration: The EPC2052 delivers 8.2A continuous drain current, compared to the EPC2016C's 18A rating. Selection of the EPC2052 is valid only when the application's maximum continuous drain current requirement does not exceed 8.2A at 25°C.

On-Resistance Performance: The EPC2052 exhibits 13.5 mOhm on-resistance at 11A and 5V, which is lower than the EPC2016C's 16 mOhm. This represents improved efficiency and reduced thermal dissipation in equivalent current conditions.

Input Capacitance: The EPC2052 specifies 575 pF input capacitance compared to the EPC2016C's 420 pF. This higher capacitance may require gate drive circuit adjustment to maintain switching speed performance.

Gate Drive Compatibility: Both parts share identical gate threshold voltage (2.5V maximum), gate charge (4.5 nC), and gate voltage range (+6V / -4V). Existing gate drive designs are directly compatible with the EPC2052 substitute.

Compliance and Certifications: Both parts maintain ROHS3 compliance, MSL Level 1 (Unlimited moisture sensitivity), and REACH Unaffected status. No additional compliance measures are required when transitioning from EPC2016C to EPC2052.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the EPC2052 directly replace the EPC2016C in existing designs?

A: Direct replacement is possible only if the application's continuous drain current requirement does not exceed 8.2A at 25°C. The EPC2052 is rated for 8.2A maximum, while the EPC2016C is rated for 18A. If the design operates at currents above 8.2A, the EPC2052 will exceed its continuous current rating and is not suitable.

Q: What is the impact of the higher input capacitance (575 pF) in the EPC2052 compared to the EPC2016C (420 pF)?

A: Higher input capacitance increases the charge required to switch the gate and may reduce switching frequency or increase gate drive power dissipation. Gate drive circuits designed for the EPC2016C may require adjustment to accommodate the EPC2052's higher capacitance while maintaining target switching performance.

Q: Are the gate drive requirements identical between EPC2016C and EPC2052?

A: Gate threshold voltage, gate charge, and gate voltage range are identical between both parts. However, the higher input capacitance of the EPC2052 may necessitate gate drive circuit modifications to maintain switching speed. Gate drive voltage and polarity requirements remain unchanged.

Q: Why is the EPC2016C marked "Not For New Designs"?

A: This designation indicates that EPC has transitioned the EPC2016C to end-of-life status. New product designs should utilize the EPC2052, which carries Active product status and ensures long-term supply availability and support.

Q: Are both parts available in the same packaging format?

A: Yes. Both the EPC2016C and EPC2052 are supplied as surface mount dies in Cut Tape and Digi-Reel packaging. Mechanical and thermal interface compatibility is maintained.

Q: Do both parts meet current regulatory compliance standards?

A: Yes. Both the EPC2016C and EPC2052 are ROHS3 Compliant, REACH Unaffected, and carry MSL Level 1 (Unlimited) moisture sensitivity rating. No additional compliance measures are required for either part.

Q: What is the primary electrical difference between the EPC2016C and EPC2052?

A: The primary difference is continuous drain current rating: EPC2016C is rated for 18A, while EPC2052 is rated for 8.2A. The EPC2052 also exhibits lower on-resistance (13.5 mOhm vs. 16 mOhm) and higher input capacitance (575 pF vs. 420 pF).