Amphenol ICC 95157-272 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The Amphenol ICC 95157-272 is a rectangular connector header designed for surface mount applications. This BERGSTIK® II series component features 72 positions arranged in 2 rows with 0.100" (2.54mm) pitch, suitable for board-to-board connections. The part is currently active in production with 800 pieces available in stock. Substitute parts are identified to address inventory availability, lead time considerations, or specific application requirements where alternative specifications remain functionally compatible.

Substiute Parts

95157-272

Amphenol ICC (FCI)In Stock: 81595157-272 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

802-10-072-30-001000

Mill-Max Manufacturing Corp.In Stock: 1976802-10-072-30-001000 Datasheet

MFR RecommendedRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

The Mill-Max Manufacturing Corp. part number 802-10-072-30-001000 qualifies as a substitute for the Amphenol ICC 95157-272 based on the following critical parameters:

• Connector Type: Both are headers with male pin contacts
• Position Count: Both feature 72 positions in 2 rows
• Pitch Specification: Both maintain 0.100" (2.54mm) mating pitch and row spacing
• Mounting Configuration: Both are surface mount, board-to-board connectors
• Termination Method: Both use solder termination with push-pull fastening
• Shrouding: Both are unshrouded designs
• Contact Loading: Both have all positions loaded

Substitution is valid where these core parameters align. Variations in contact geometry, material composition, and finish specifications do not preclude functional equivalence in applications where the primary requirements are position count, pitch, mounting type, and electrical connectivity.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

Amphenol ICC 95157-272 is the primary specification. This part is active in production with established supply at 800 pieces. It carries UL94 V-0 flammability certification and operates across -65°C to 130°C. Current rating is specified at 3A. RoHS non-compliance status should be confirmed against project requirements.

Mill-Max 802-10-072-30-001000 serves as a functional substitute where inventory or lead time constraints apply. This part is ROHS3 compliant, addressing regulatory requirements where the primary part does not. Inventory availability is higher at 1900 pieces. Operating temperature and current rating specifications are not provided for this substitute; confirmation against application requirements is necessary before selection.

Selection between these parts should prioritize the primary specification unless supply constraints or regulatory compliance requirements necessitate the substitute.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the Mill-Max 802-10-072-30-001000 directly replace the Amphenol ICC 95157-272 in existing designs?

A: Both connectors share identical position count (72), pitch (0.100"), row configuration (2 rows), mounting type (surface mount), and termination method (solder). The core mechanical and electrical interface is compatible. Differences in contact length, insulation height, and contact geometry may affect mating force and insertion characteristics; these should be evaluated against specific application requirements.

Q: What are the key differences between these two parts?

A: Primary differences include contact material (Phosphor Bronze vs. Brass Alloy), contact shape (Square vs. Circular), contact finish thickness (15.0µin vs. 10.0µin), and RoHS compliance status (non-compliant vs. ROHS3 compliant). The Mill-Max part specifies PCT insulation material, while the Amphenol part does not provide this specification. Operating temperature and current rating are specified for the Amphenol part but not for the Mill-Max substitute.

Q: Are there packaging differences between these parts?

A: Yes. The Amphenol ICC 95157-272 is supplied in bag packaging, while the Mill-Max 802-10-072-30-001000 is supplied in tube packaging. This affects handling, storage, and component placement considerations in manufacturing environments.

Q: Which part should be selected for new designs?

A: The Amphenol ICC 95157-272 is the primary specification and should be used for new designs unless specific constraints exist. The Mill-Max substitute is appropriate where ROHS3 compliance is mandatory or where supply availability of the primary part is insufficient.

Q: Does RoHS compliance status affect substitution eligibility?

A: RoHS compliance is a regulatory requirement that depends on end-product application and market destination. The Amphenol part is RoHS non-compliant, while the Mill-Max part is ROHS3 compliant. Selection should align with applicable regulatory requirements for the end application.