TE Connectivity AMP Connectors 5-146132-3 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The TE Connectivity AMP Connectors 5-146132-3 is a rectangular connector header designed for surface mount applications. This connector is part of the AMPMODU Mod II series and features a 5-position, single-row configuration with 0.100" (2.54mm) pitch spacing. The component is classified as Active product status and is RoHS Compliant with Moisture Sensitivity Level 1 (Unlimited).

Substitute parts become necessary when surface mount availability is constrained, when through-hole mounting is preferred for specific board designs, or when alternative contact finishes and materials are required to meet particular application requirements while maintaining electrical and mechanical compatibility.

Substiute Parts

5-146132-3

TE Connectivity AMP ConnectorsIn Stock: 8185-146132-3 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

77315-801-05LF

Amphenol ICC (FCI)In Stock: 89077315-801-05LF Datasheet

SimilarRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution of the TE Connectivity 5-146132-3 with the Amphenol ICC 77315-801-05LF is permissible based on the following alignment of critical parameters:

Matching Parameters:

• Connector Type: Header, Breakaway (both parts)
• Contact Type: Male Pin (both parts)
• Number of Positions: 5 (both parts)
• Number of Rows: 1 (both parts)
• Pitch - Mating: 0.100" (2.54mm) (both parts)
• Termination: Solder (both parts)
• Fastening Type: Push-Pull (both parts)
• Current Rating: 3A (both parts)
• Material Flammability Rating: UL94 V-0 (both parts)
• RoHS Status: RoHS Compliant (both parts)
• Moisture Sensitivity Level: 1 (Unlimited) (both parts)

Differing Parameters:

• Mounting Type: Surface Mount (5-146132-3) versus Through Hole, Right Angle (77315-801-05LF)
• Operating Temperature: -65°C ~ 105°C (5-146132-3) versus -65°C ~ 125°C (77315-801-05LF)
• Contact Finish - Mating: Tin (5-146132-3) versus Gold or Gold, GXT™ (77315-801-05LF)
• Contact Material: Copper Alloy (5-146132-3) versus Phosphor Bronze (77315-801-05LF)
• Insulation Material: Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) (5-146132-3) versus Thermoplastic (77315-801-05LF)

The substitute part maintains electrical and mechanical compatibility through identical position count, pitch spacing, contact type, current rating, and push-pull fastening mechanism. Selection between these parts depends on mounting method requirements and operating environment specifications.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

Both the TE Connectivity 5-146132-3 and Amphenol ICC 77315-801-05LF are Active product status components with RoHS Compliance and Moisture Sensitivity Level 1 (Unlimited), indicating both are suitable for current procurement and deployment.

Selection Criteria Based on Application Requirements:

The TE Connectivity 5-146132-3 is appropriate for applications requiring surface mount assembly processes and operating environments with maximum temperatures up to 105°C.

The Amphenol ICC 77315-801-05LF is appropriate for applications requiring through-hole, right-angle mounting configurations and operating environments with maximum temperatures up to 125°C. The gold contact finish provides enhanced corrosion resistance compared to the tin finish of the primary part.

Both components maintain identical electrical performance through 3A current rating, identical mechanical compatibility through 5-position, 2.54mm pitch configuration, and identical safety certifications through UL94 V-0 flammability rating. Selection between these parts is determined by board-level mounting method requirements and thermal operating environment specifications rather than electrical performance differences.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the Amphenol ICC 77315-801-05LF directly replace the TE Connectivity 5-146132-3 in existing designs?

A: Direct replacement depends on board design. The primary difference is mounting type: the TE Connectivity part is surface mount while the Amphenol ICC part is through-hole, right-angle. Board layout and hole patterns must accommodate the through-hole configuration. Electrical and mechanical compatibility are maintained through identical position count, pitch spacing, contact type, and current rating.

Q: What is the significance of the contact finish difference between these parts?

A: The TE Connectivity 5-146132-3 features tin contact finish while the Amphenol ICC 77315-801-05LF features gold or gold GXT™ contact finish. Gold finish provides superior corrosion resistance and is preferred in high-humidity or corrosive environments. Tin finish is suitable for standard industrial applications. Both finishes support identical current ratings and electrical performance.

Q: Are there temperature operating range considerations for substitution?

A: The TE Connectivity 5-146132-3 operates from -65°C to 105°C while the Amphenol ICC 77315-801-05LF operates from -65°C to 125°C. If the application requires operation above 105°C, the Amphenol ICC part is required. For applications within the -65°C to 105°C range, both parts are suitable.

Q: What packaging differences exist between these parts?

A: The TE Connectivity 5-146132-3 is supplied in Tube packaging while the Amphenol ICC 77315-801-05LF is supplied in Bulk packaging. Packaging selection affects handling, storage, and automated assembly processes but does not impact electrical or mechanical performance.

Q: Do both parts meet the same compliance standards?

A: Both parts are RoHS Compliant, feature UL94 V-0 material flammability rating, and have Moisture Sensitivity Level 1 (Unlimited). Both are classified as Active product status. The Amphenol ICC part additionally carries REACH Affected status. Compliance requirements are met by both components for standard industrial applications.

Q: What is the difference in insulation material between these parts?

A: The TE Connectivity 5-146132-3 uses Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP) insulation while the Amphenol ICC 77315-801-05LF uses Thermoplastic insulation. Both materials achieve UL94 V-0 flammability rating. LCP provides superior dimensional stability and higher temperature performance, while thermoplastic offers cost efficiency. Both materials are suitable for standard connector applications.