TE Connectivity AMP Connectors 280620-2 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The TE Connectivity AMP Connectors 280620-2 is a rectangular connector header designed for through-hole, right-angle mounting applications. This connector features 12 positions with a 0.156" (3.96mm) pitch and is part of the AMPMODU Mod I series. The component maintains active product status and is manufactured with shrouded design for board-to-board or cable connectivity. Substitute parts are identified when equivalent electrical and mechanical parameters align with the main part specifications, enabling component interchangeability in applications where form factor and performance requirements are met.

Substiute Parts

280620-2

TE Connectivity AMP ConnectorsIn Stock: 807280620-2 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

1718141012

MolexIn Stock: 17601718141012 Datasheet

SimilarRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution eligibility for rectangular connector headers is determined by alignment of core electrical and mechanical parameters. The primary criteria for the TE Connectivity 280620-2 include:

Critical Matching Parameters:

• Pitch - Mating: 0.156" (3.96mm)
• Number of Positions: 12
• Number of Rows: 1
• Connector Type: Header
• Contact Type: Male Pin
• Mounting Type: Through Hole, Right Angle
• Termination: Solder
• Contact Material: Brass
• Contact Finish - Mating: Gold
• Contact Finish - Post: Tin

The Molex 1718141012 satisfies these core parameters, establishing it as a valid substitute. Both components operate within the same pitch standard, position count, and mounting configuration. Variations in secondary parameters such as shrouding design (2 Wall versus 1 Wall), contact shape (Rectangular versus Square), insulation material (Polycarbonate, Glass Filled versus Polyamide), and flammability rating (UL94 V-0 versus UL94 V-2) represent design differences that may influence application suitability but do not preclude substitution when mechanical and electrical compatibility is required.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

Both the TE Connectivity 280620-2 and Molex 1718141012 maintain active product status and comply with ROHS3 standards. The components share identical pitch, position count, and mounting configuration, establishing functional compatibility for standard board-to-board and cable connection applications.

Selection between these components should account for the following provided specifications:

TE Connectivity 280620-2 Characteristics:

• UL94 V-0 flammability rating (higher flame resistance)
• Polycarbonate, glass-filled insulation material
• 2-wall shrouding design
• Rectangular contact shape
• Shorter post length (0.126")
• Lower insulation height (0.346")

Molex 1718141012 Characteristics:

• UL94 V-2 flammability rating
• Polyamide (PA) nylon insulation material
• 1-wall shrouding design
• Square contact shape
• Longer post length (0.100")
• Higher insulation height (0.394")

Applications requiring enhanced flame resistance or specific insulation material properties should reference the flammability rating and insulation composition. Both components are REACH unaffected or affected status as specified and carry identical export classification (EAR99). Inventory availability differs between manufacturers, with TE Connectivity 280620-2 stocked at 784 pieces and Molex 1718141012 at 1728 pieces.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the Molex 1718141012 directly replace the TE Connectivity 280620-2 in existing designs?

A: The Molex 1718141012 shares the same pitch (0.156"), position count (12), row configuration (1), mounting type (through-hole right-angle), and contact materials (brass with gold mating finish and tin post finish). Direct mechanical and electrical compatibility is established for applications where the secondary parameter differences do not impose constraints. Design review is necessary when flammability rating (UL94 V-0 versus V-2) or insulation material properties are specified requirements.

Q: What are the key differences in physical dimensions between these connectors?

A: Contact length at mating interface differs by 0.052" (1.33mm), with the Molex part measuring 0.446" versus the TE Connectivity part at 0.394". Post length differs by 0.026" (0.66mm). Insulation height varies by 0.048" (2.20mm). These dimensional variations may affect PCB layout, mating depth, and stacking height in multi-connector assemblies. Mechanical fit verification is required when space constraints are present.

Q: Are both parts compliant with current regulatory standards?

A: Both components are ROHS3 compliant and carry EAR99 export classification. The TE Connectivity 280620-2 is REACH affected, while the Molex 1718141012 is REACH unaffected. Both maintain MSL 1 (Unlimited) moisture sensitivity rating. Regulatory compliance verification should reference specific application requirements and regional restrictions.

Q: What is the significance of the shrouding design difference?

A: The TE Connectivity 280620-2 features 2-wall shrouding, while the Molex 1718141012 features 1-wall shrouding. Shrouding design affects mechanical guidance during mating, contact protection, and insertion force characteristics. The 2-wall design provides enhanced contact alignment and protection, while the 1-wall design reduces material volume and may affect mating force requirements.

Q: How do the contact shape differences impact connector performance?

A: The TE Connectivity 280620-2 uses rectangular contacts, while the Molex 1718141012 uses square contacts. Contact shape influences contact resistance, mating force, and wear characteristics. Both shapes are standard in rectangular connector design and function within their respective series specifications. Application-specific performance requirements should be evaluated against manufacturer contact specifications.

Q: What packaging and inventory considerations apply to these parts?

A: Both components are supplied in bulk packaging. TE Connectivity 280620-2 inventory is 784 pieces, while Molex 1718141012 inventory is 1728 pieces. Procurement decisions should account for lead time, minimum order quantities, and supply chain availability when selecting between equivalent parts.