Phoenix Contact 1704233 Terminal Block Plug - Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The Phoenix Contact 1704233 is a 9-position terminal block plug with female sockets, designed for 5.00mm pitch applications. This component features screw-type termination with rising cage clamp technology and is rated for 14.6A (IEC) / 10A (UL) operation. The part is classified as obsolete, making identification of suitable substitute components essential for ongoing system maintenance and new design implementations where equivalent functionality is required.

Substiute Parts

1704233

Phoenix ContactIn Stock: 11081704233 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

HW0970500000G

Amphenol AnytekIn Stock: 1084HW0970500000G Datasheet

SimilarRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution of the Phoenix Contact 1704233 is determined by strict alignment of the following critical parameters:

• Connector Configuration: 9 positions at 0.197" (5.00mm) pitch with female socket termination
• Mechanical Interface: Free hanging (in-line) mounting with 180° wire entry orientation
• Electrical Performance: Minimum 10A (UL) current rating and 300V (UL) voltage rating
• Wire Compatibility: Support for 12-26 AWG conductor gauges
• Physical Dimensions: Insulation height of 0.591" (15.00mm)
• Material Compliance: UL94 V-0 flammability rating and tin contact finish

The Amphenol Anytek HW0970500000G meets these critical parameters, providing functional equivalence despite differences in termination methodology and additional operating temperature specification.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The Amphenol Anytek HW0970500000G (part number HW0970500000G) is a functional equivalent for the obsolete Phoenix Contact 1704233. Both components satisfy the critical electrical and mechanical parameters required for 9-position, 5.00mm pitch terminal block applications.

The primary distinction between these components is the termination methodology: the Phoenix Contact 1704233 employs screw-type rising cage clamp termination, while the Amphenol Anytek HW0970500000G utilizes screwless push-in spring termination. Both approaches provide secure wire retention within the specified wire gauge range (12-26 AWG).

The Amphenol Anytek substitute carries active product status and ROHS3 compliance, providing supply chain continuity and regulatory alignment for current applications. The wire strip length tolerance of 8-9mm for the substitute accommodates the 8mm specification of the original component.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the Amphenol Anytek HW0970500000G directly replace the Phoenix Contact 1704233 in existing assemblies?

A: Yes, provided the application accommodates the termination method difference. The Phoenix Contact 1704233 uses screw-type termination, while the Amphenol Anytek HW0970500000G uses push-in spring termination. Both methods secure wires within the 12-26 AWG range and maintain equivalent electrical performance at 10A (UL) / 300V (UL).

Q: Are there any dimensional incompatibilities between these components?

A: No. Both components share identical pitch (5.00mm), insulation height (0.591"), and mounting configuration (free hanging, in-line, 180° wire entry). The wire strip length tolerance of 8-9mm for the substitute encompasses the 8mm specification of the original.

Q: What compliance certifications apply to the substitute part?

A: The Amphenol Anytek HW0970500000G carries ROHS3 compliance and REACH unaffected status. Both components meet UL94 V-0 flammability requirements and maintain tin contact mating finish specifications.

Q: Why is the Phoenix Contact 1704233 classified as obsolete?

A: Obsolete status indicates the component is no longer in active production. The Amphenol Anytek HW0970500000G provides continued availability for equivalent functionality in maintenance and redesign scenarios.

Q: Are there electrical performance differences between screw and push-in termination methods?

A: No. Both termination methods provide equivalent electrical performance within the specified current and voltage ratings. The selection between methods depends on assembly process requirements and application constraints.