TE Connectivity AMP 1052075-1 SMA Connector Plug Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The TE Connectivity AMP 1052075-1 is an SMA connector plug designed for coaxial RF applications requiring 50-ohm impedance. This component is a male pin, right-angle solder connector intended for free-hanging in-line mounting with threaded fastening. The part is classified as obsolete, making identification of equivalent and substitute components necessary for ongoing system support, maintenance, and new design implementations where legacy compatibility is required.

Substiute Parts

1052075-1

TE Connectivity AMP ConnectorsIn Stock: 8101052075-1 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

142-0403-101

Cinch Connectivity SolutionsIn Stock: 2699142-0403-101 Datasheet

SimilarRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution of the TE Connectivity AMP 1052075-1 is determined by strict alignment of the following critical parameters:

Mandatory Matching Parameters:

• Connector Style: SMA
• Connector Type: Plug, Male Pin
• Impedance: 50 Ohms
• Contact Termination: Solder
• Shield Termination: Crimp
• Mounting Type: Free Hanging (In-Line), Right Angle
• Fastening Type: Threaded
• Number of Ports: 1
• Dielectric Material: Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)

Compatible Operating Ranges:

• Operating Temperature: Substitute must support minimum -65°C and maximum 125°C
• Voltage Rating: Substitute must support minimum 250 V
• Mating Cycles: Substitute must support minimum 500 cycles

The Cinch Connectivity Solutions 142-0403-101 meets all mandatory matching parameters and exceeds the operating temperature range and frequency specifications of the original component.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The Cinch Connectivity Solutions 142-0403-101 is a direct functional substitute for the TE Connectivity AMP 1052075-1 based on the following engineering criteria:

Compliance and Regulatory Status: The substitute part holds active product status with defined ROHS3 compliance and REACH affected designation, providing superior regulatory clarity compared to the obsolete original component with vendor-undefined REACH status. Both components maintain equivalent voltage and mating cycle ratings.

Electrical and Mechanical Compatibility: All critical parameters for RF coaxial connector substitution are matched: SMA connector style, male pin plug configuration, 50-ohm impedance, solder contact termination, crimp shield termination, free-hanging right-angle mounting, and threaded fastening. Both components utilize PTFE dielectric material and support identical voltage and mating cycle specifications.

Operating Environment: The substitute part extends the operating temperature range to -65°C ~ 165°C, exceeding the original specification of -65°C ~ 125°C. This enhanced thermal capability provides additional margin for applications operating at elevated temperatures.

Cable Compatibility: The substitute supports a broader cable group range (RG-161, 174, 188, 316) compared to the original component (RG-188A), enabling flexibility in cable selection while maintaining the specified RG-188A compatibility.

Material Considerations: The substitute employs brass for both body and center contact materials, differing from the original stainless steel body and beryllium copper center contact. These material substitutions maintain electrical performance within the 50-ohm impedance specification and do not compromise functional compatibility for standard RF applications.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the Cinch Connectivity Solutions 142-0403-101 directly replace the TE Connectivity AMP 1052075-1 in existing assemblies?

A: Yes. Both connectors share identical connector style (SMA), type (plug, male pin), impedance (50 ohms), termination methods (solder contact, crimp shield), mounting configuration (free-hanging right-angle), and fastening type (threaded). The substitute meets or exceeds all specified electrical and mechanical parameters.

Q: What is the significance of the different center contact materials?

A: The original component uses beryllium copper while the substitute uses brass. Both materials provide adequate electrical conductivity for 50-ohm RF applications. The material difference does not affect impedance matching or signal integrity within the specified operating parameters.

Q: Does the extended operating temperature range of the substitute create compatibility issues?

A: No. The substitute's extended range (-65°C ~ 165°C) encompasses the original specification (-65°C ~ 125°C). Extended operating range capability does not create incompatibility; it provides additional thermal margin for applications requiring higher temperature operation.

Q: Are there packaging differences between the original and substitute parts?

A: Yes. The original component is packaged as individual units with 744 pieces in stock, while the substitute is supplied in bulk packaging with 2667 pieces available. Both include connector, end cap, and additional components. The substitute includes a sleeve instead of a ferrule and heat shrink. Packaging format does not affect electrical or mechanical compatibility.

Q: What cable types are compatible with the substitute connector?

A: The substitute supports RG-161, RG-174, RG-188, and RG-316 cable groups. The original component specifies RG-188A compatibility. The substitute maintains RG-188 compatibility while offering additional cable options.

Q: How do the RoHS and REACH compliance statuses compare?

A: The original component holds RoHS compliance with vendor-undefined REACH status. The substitute is ROHS3 compliant with defined REACH affected status. The substitute provides clearer regulatory documentation for supply chain and compliance tracking purposes.

Q: Is the 12.4 GHz maximum frequency specification of the substitute a limiting factor?

A: The original component does not specify a maximum frequency rating. The substitute's 12.4 GHz specification represents a defined upper frequency limit for RF performance. For applications operating below 12.4 GHz, this specification does not present a constraint. Applications requiring operation above this frequency require verification against specific system requirements.

Q: What is the significance of the different body materials?

A: The original uses stainless steel while the substitute uses brass. Both materials provide adequate structural integrity and shielding for RF connector applications. The material difference does not affect electrical performance or mechanical compatibility within the specified operating parameters.