TE Connectivity AMP Connectors 104315-5 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The TE Connectivity AMP Connectors 104315-5 is a rectangular connector header designed for through-hole, right-angle mounting applications. This connector features 26 positions arranged in 2 rows with 0.100" (2.54mm) pitch spacing, suitable for board-to-cable/wire interconnections. The part is classified as obsolete, necessitating identification of active equivalent alternatives to maintain design continuity and ensure ongoing component availability for production and service applications.

Substiute Parts

104315-5

TE Connectivity AMP ConnectorsIn Stock: 1161104315-5 Datasheet

Current PartRFQ

1761609-9

TE Connectivity AMP ConnectorsIn Stock: 20761761609-9 Datasheet

SimilarRFQ

Key Parameters

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution of the obsolete TE Connectivity 104315-5 with active equivalent part 1761609-9 is based on strict alignment of the following critical parameters:

Electrical Compatibility:

• Identical connector type (Header), contact type (Male Pin), and contact configuration (26 positions, 2 rows)
• Matching pitch specifications: 0.100" (2.54mm) mating pitch and 0.100" (2.54mm) row spacing
• Equivalent electrical ratings: 1A per contact and 250VAC voltage rating
• Identical operating temperature range: -65°C ~ 105°C

Mechanical Compatibility:

• Identical mounting configuration: Through hole, right-angle orientation
• Matching shrouding design: Shrouded - 4 wall construction
• Identical termination method: Solder
• Matching fastening type: Latch lock/eject hooks
• Identical style: Board to cable/wire interconnection

Physical Dimensions:

• Contact mating length: 0.237" (6.02mm) versus 0.240" (6.10mm) — within acceptable tolerance
• Insulation height: 0.362" (9.20mm) versus 0.360" (9.14mm) — within acceptable tolerance
• Contact post length: 0.102" (2.60mm) versus 0.135" (3.43mm) — functional difference noted
• Contact finish thickness - post: 100.0µin (2.54µm) — identical specification

The substitute part 1761609-9 maintains full functional and mechanical compatibility while offering active product status and improved compliance certifications.

Parameter Comparison

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The TE Connectivity 1761609-9 is the direct active equivalent for the obsolete 104315-5 rectangular connector header. Selection of the substitute part is supported by the following engineering factors:

Product Status and Availability: The 1761609-9 maintains active product status with 2053 units in stock, ensuring reliable component availability for ongoing production and service requirements. The 104315-5 is classified as obsolete with no path for future procurement.

Regulatory Compliance: The substitute part 1761609-9 is ROHS3 compliant, meeting current environmental and regulatory requirements for electronic components. The original part 104315-5 is RoHS non-compliant, presenting compliance risks for new designs and applications subject to RoHS directives.

Functional Equivalence: Both parts maintain identical electrical specifications (1A per contact, 250VAC rating), identical connector configuration (26 positions, 2 rows, 0.100" pitch), and identical operating temperature range (-65°C ~ 105°C). The mechanical mounting interface, shrouding design, and termination method are fully compatible.

Material and Construction Differences: The substitute part incorporates phosphor bronze contact material and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) insulation material, compared to brass contacts and polyamide insulation in the original part. These material upgrades provide enhanced durability and thermal stability. The contact post length differs (0.102" versus 0.135"), which requires verification against specific PCB design requirements but does not affect the mating interface or electrical performance.

Packaging Consideration: The substitute part 1761609-9 is supplied in tube packaging, compared to the original part's unspecified packaging. This difference affects handling and storage procedures but does not impact component functionality or performance.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the 1761609-9 directly replace the 104315-5 in existing designs?

A: The 1761609-9 is mechanically and electrically compatible with the 104315-5 for the mating interface and electrical performance. The primary design consideration is the contact post length difference (0.102" versus 0.135"), which must be verified against PCB hole depth and solder pad specifications. If the original design accommodates the shorter post length, direct substitution is feasible.

Q: What are the key differences between these two connector headers?

A: The primary differences are: (1) Product status — 104315-5 is obsolete while 1761609-9 is active; (2) RoHS compliance — 1761609-9 is ROHS3 compliant while 104315-5 is non-compliant; (3) Contact material — 1761609-9 uses phosphor bronze versus brass in the original; (4) Insulation material — 1761609-9 uses PBT versus polyamide in the original; (5) Contact post length — 1761609-9 has 0.102" posts versus 0.135" in the original; (6) Contact finish on posts — 1761609-9 uses tin versus tin-lead in the original.

Q: Are the electrical ratings identical between these parts?

A: Yes. Both parts are rated for 1A per contact and 250VAC. The operating temperature range is identical at -65°C ~ 105°C. The mating pitch (0.100"), row spacing (0.100"), and contact configuration (26 positions, 2 rows) are identical.

Q: Does the contact post length difference affect compatibility?

A: The contact post length difference (0.102" in the substitute versus 0.135" in the original) affects the depth of solder penetration into PCB holes. This must be evaluated against the specific PCB design, hole depth, and solder pad specifications. If the original design was optimized for the longer post length, the shorter post in the substitute may require PCB layout adjustment.

Q: What is the significance of the material changes in the substitute part?

A: The phosphor bronze contact material in the 1761609-9 provides improved spring characteristics and durability compared to brass. The polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) insulation material offers superior thermal stability and moisture resistance compared to polyamide. These material upgrades enhance long-term reliability and performance consistency.

Q: Is the packaging difference significant?

A: The substitute part 1761609-9 is supplied in tube packaging. This affects component handling, storage, and automated assembly processes. Tube packaging typically provides better protection during transport and storage compared to bulk packaging, but may require different feeder compatibility for automated assembly equipment.

Q: Why is RoHS compliance important for this substitution?

A: RoHS3 compliance in the 1761609-9 ensures the part meets current environmental regulations for lead content and hazardous substances. The original 104315-5 is RoHS non-compliant, which restricts its use in applications subject to RoHS directives and may create supply chain complications for manufacturers operating under RoHS requirements.

Q: Are there any applications where the 104315-5 cannot be substituted with the 1761609-9?

A: Applications with strict PCB design constraints related to contact post length may require design modification to accommodate the shorter 0.102" posts in the substitute part. Additionally, applications requiring tin-lead solder finish on contact posts (rather than tin) would need evaluation of the material change impact on solder joint reliability.