Amphenol ICC 68016-136 Equivalent & Substitute Parts

Part Overview

The Amphenol ICC 68016-136 is a rectangular connector header featuring a right-angle, through-hole mount configuration with 36 positions at 0.100" (2.54mm) pitch. This connector is part of the BERGSTIK® II series and is classified as obsolete. Due to its obsolete status and limited availability in new production, identifying equivalent substitute parts is essential for ongoing system maintenance, repair, and redesign applications where this connector type is required.

Substiute Parts

68016-136
Amphenol ICC (FCI)In Stock: 113568016-136 Datasheet
68016-136
Current Part
4-103148-0
TE Connectivity AMP ConnectorsIn Stock: 9734-103148-0 Datasheet
4-103148-0
MFR Recommended

Key Parameters

Parameter Value
Manufacturer Part Number 68016-136
Manufacturer Amphenol ICC (FCI)
Category Rectangular Connectors
Series BERGSTIK® II
Connector Type Header
Contact Type Male Pin
Pitch - Mating 0.100" (2.54mm)
Number of Positions 36
Number of Rows 1
Mounting Type Through Hole, Right Angle
Termination Solder
Current Rating 3A
Operating Temperature -65°C ~ 130°C
Material Flammability Rating UL94 V-0
Product Status Obsolete

Substitute Part Grouping Explanation

Substitution of the Amphenol ICC 68016-136 is constrained by the following critical parameters:

  • Pitch (Mating): Must remain 0.100" (2.54mm) to ensure mechanical and electrical compatibility with existing mating connectors and PCB layouts
  • Mounting Type: Through-hole, right-angle configuration is required for board-level integration
  • Contact Type: Male pin headers are specified for this application
  • Current Rating: Minimum 3A capability required
  • Operating Temperature Range: Must support -65°C ~ 130°C or equivalent
  • Termination Method: Solder termination is mandatory for through-hole assembly
  • Material Flammability: UL94 V-0 rating required for safety compliance

The substitute part 4-103148-0 (TE Connectivity AMP Connectors, AMPMODU Mod II series) meets these core substitution criteria. However, the number of positions differs (40 vs. 36), which may require design consideration depending on application requirements.

Parameter Comparison

Parameter 68016-136 (Amphenol ICC) 4-103148-0 (TE Connectivity)
Connector Type Header Header, Breakaway
Contact Type Male Pin Male Pin
Pitch - Mating 0.100" (2.54mm) 0.100" (2.54mm)
Number of Positions 36 40
Number of Rows 1 1
Mounting Type Through Hole, Right Angle Through Hole, Right Angle
Termination Solder Solder
Contact Length - Mating 0.230" (5.84mm) 0.230" (5.84mm)
Contact Length - Post 0.120" (3.05mm) 0.120" (3.05mm)
Insulation Height 0.095" (2.41mm) 0.138" (4.60mm)
Contact Shape Square Square
Contact Finish - Mating Gold or Gold, GXT™ Gold
Contact Finish Thickness - Mating 30.0µin (0.76µm) 30.0µin (0.76µm)
Contact Material Phosphor Bronze Copper Alloy
Operating Temperature -65°C ~ 130°C -65°C ~ 105°C
Material Flammability Rating UL94 V-0 UL94 V-0
Insulation Color Black Black
Current Rating 3A 3A
Product Status Obsolete Obsolete
RoHS Status RoHS non-compliant RoHS non-compliant
Moisture Sensitivity Level 1 (Unlimited) 1 (Unlimited)

Engineering Selection Recommendations

The TE Connectivity 4-103148-0 serves as a functional substitute for the Amphenol ICC 68016-136 based on matching core electrical and mechanical parameters: identical 0.100" (2.54mm) pitch, through-hole right-angle mounting, solder termination, 3A current rating, and UL94 V-0 flammability compliance.

Key considerations for substitution:

  • Position Count Difference: The substitute provides 40 positions versus 36 in the original part. Applications requiring exactly 36 positions may accommodate the additional 4 positions if PCB layout permits, or positions may remain unloaded.
  • Operating Temperature Range: The substitute operates to 105°C maximum versus 130°C for the original. Applications requiring operation above 105°C are not suitable for this substitute.
  • Insulation Height: The substitute has a greater insulation height (0.138" vs. 0.095"), which may affect PCB clearance and board-level spacing. Physical verification against PCB layout is necessary.
  • Contact Material: The substitute uses copper alloy versus phosphor bronze in the original. Both materials meet the specified current and contact finish requirements.
  • Compliance Status: Both parts are RoHS non-compliant and carry identical MSL ratings, making them equivalent from a compliance perspective.

Both parts are classified as obsolete, indicating limited future availability. Long-term design considerations should evaluate modern connector alternatives that offer active production status and RoHS compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Can the 4-103148-0 directly replace the 68016-136 in existing designs?

A: Direct replacement is possible if the application accommodates the 40-position configuration and does not require operation above 105°C. The identical pitch, mounting type, and current rating ensure electrical and mechanical compatibility at the connector interface. However, PCB layout verification is required due to the increased insulation height of the substitute.

Q: What is the significance of the position count difference (36 vs. 40)?

A: The substitute provides four additional positions. If the original design uses all 36 positions, the extra positions on the substitute remain unused. If the original design uses fewer than 36 positions, the substitute accommodates the same signal count. PCB routing and connector footprint must be evaluated to confirm compatibility.

Q: Are there thermal performance differences between these parts?

A: Yes. The original part operates to 130°C, while the substitute operates to 105°C maximum. Applications requiring sustained operation above 105°C cannot use the 4-103148-0 substitute. Verify the maximum operating temperature requirement of your application before substitution.

Q: How does the insulation height difference affect PCB design?

A: The substitute has an insulation height of 0.138" compared to 0.095" for the original. This 0.043" difference may impact clearance to adjacent components, traces, or board features. Physical measurement and layout verification are necessary to confirm adequate spacing.

Q: Are both parts suitable for new designs?

A: Both parts carry obsolete status, indicating discontinued production. Neither part is recommended for new designs. Modern rectangular connector alternatives with active production status and RoHS compliance should be evaluated for new applications.

Q: What is the difference between phosphor bronze and copper alloy contact materials?

A: Both materials provide adequate electrical conductivity and contact durability for the specified 3A current rating and 0.100" pitch application. The contact finish (gold plating) provides the primary wear and corrosion resistance in both cases. Material selection does not affect electrical performance for this application.

Q: Are there any compliance or certification differences?

A: Both parts are RoHS non-compliant and carry identical UL94 V-0 flammability ratings and MSL 1 moisture sensitivity levels. No compliance advantage exists between the two parts.

Request Quote (Ships tomorrow)